Here's a statistic that will make your blood boil: While women generate 78 cents of revenue per dollar invested compared to men's measly 31 cents, female founders receive only 2.3% of all venture capital funding. The remaining 97.7% goes to male-dominated teams.
This isn't just unfair, it's economically insane.
What's even more shocking?
There's a $1.7 trillion global financing gap holding women-owned businesses back, while billions in grant funding sits unclaimed because women don't know these opportunities exist.
The Aurora Tech Award's 2026 Open Call is your chance to change that narrative. Applications close November 12, 2025.
This isn't just unfair, it's economically insane.
What's even more shocking?
There's a $1.7 trillion global financing gap holding women-owned businesses back, while billions in grant funding sits unclaimed because women don't know these opportunities exist.
The Aurora Tech Award's 2026 Open Call is your chance to change that narrative. Applications close November 12, 2025.
The funding disparity is a crisis. Female entrepreneurs who launch a startup after a previous failure raise 53.3% less capital than men who had identical business ideas and track records. Meanwhile, only 4% of women are founders of three or more companies, contrasted with 16% of men. This systemic inequality is precisely why grant funding has become the secret weapon for savvy female founders who refuse to play by rules that weren't designed for them.
The $85,000 Aurora Tech Award: Your Gateway to Breaking the Funding Ceiling
The Aurora Tech Award isn't just another grant, it's a declaration of war against the funding inequality that has plagued female entrepreneurs for decades. Founded by inDrive in 2021, this global prize supports women-led startups that combine innovation with impact. The 2025 edition attracted a record-breaking 2,018 applications from 116 countries, double the previous year's submissions.
Here's what makes Aurora Tech Award different from every other funding opportunity cluttering your inbox. The total prize fund reaches $85,000, distributed among the top winners: $50,000 for first place, $20,000 for second, and $15,000 for third. But the money is just the beginning. Winners gain access to a curated network of investors and strategic partners, inDrive's global expertise and mentoring support, plus resources to grow, fundraise, and scale internationally.
The eligibility criteria are straightforward yet strategic. Your startup must be founded or co-founded and led by a woman, registered no more than 5 years ago, have a working prototype or MVP, be at pre-seed or seed stage, and fit within the $6 million total investment funding limit. The application deadline is November 12, 2025, with quarterfinalists announced December 8, 2025.
👉 Apply by November 12, 2025
👉 Apply by November 12, 2025
The Shocking Truth About Female Founder Funding Statistics
Let's rip the band-aid off and examine the brutal reality of female entrepreneurship funding. In 2024, companies founded solely by women garnered just 1% of total capital invested in US venture-backed startups, down from 2% in 2023. This represents the lowest share of venture funding for female-only teams in five years.
The numbers become even more staggering when you examine the deal-by-deal breakdown. Female-founded companies represented 6.4% of deals but received only 2.3% of capital, with an average deal size of $5.2 million compared to $11.7 million for male-only founded companies. This "double gap" problem means women face fewer opportunities combined with smaller check sizes when opportunities do materialize.
The psychological toll is devastating. 34% of female founders reported burnout in 2023, significantly higher than their male counterparts. The funding shortage isn't just about money, it's about validation, opportunity, and the mental health crisis affecting women entrepreneurs worldwide.
Yet here's the paradox that should infuriate every investor ignoring female founders: Female-led companies demonstrate superior performance, generating 78 cents of revenue per dollar invested compared to just 31 cents for male-founded startups. Boston Consulting Group research shows companies with more diverse management teams have 19% higher revenues. The data is irrefutable: investing in women isn't just morally right, it's financially superior.
Grant Categories: Your Complete Funding Arsenal
Government and Institutional Grants
Government grants represent the most stable and substantial funding opportunities for female entrepreneurs. The Small Business Administration provides crucial financial support, with federal grants becoming increasingly important as only 40% of Black women received PPP loans during the pandemic.
The European Prize for Women Innovators offers €100,000, €70,000, and €50,000 for the top three applicants, celebrating women entrepreneurs with innovative ventures contributing to positive change. The UK's Women in Innovation Award provides £75,000 grants to 50 winners annually, along with tailored coaching and mentoring for innovative projects.
Corporate-Sponsored Programs
Corporate grants often provide not only funding but also strategic partnerships and market access. The Cartier Women's Initiative supports early-stage businesses led by women with significant growth potential, offering $100,000 along with workshops, networking events, and executive programs.
Google for Startups Accelerator: Women Founders caters specifically to women-led AI startups in Europe and Israel, providing up to $150,000 in equity-free funding plus mentoring from Google experts
Industry-Specific Opportunities
Technology grants dominate the landscape for obvious reasons—tech startups scale faster and generate higher returns. Women TechEU focuses on supporting women leading deep tech startups, offering €75,000 non-dilutive grants along with personalized business development programs.
The healthcare sector offers substantial opportunities through programs like the Women's Institute for Equal Opportunity Rural Women's Challenge Program, which promotes competitiveness of projects led by women in rural areas.
Micro-Grants and Monthly Programs
Don't overlook smaller, consistent funding streams. The Amber Grant offers $10,000 monthly grants plus $25,000 annual grants, with incredibly accessible application processes and rotating special categories. HerRise MicroGrant provides $500 monthly to BIPOC women founders with clear impact goals, featuring quick turnaround times.
Insider Grant Writing Secrets That Guarantee Results
The difference between funded and unfunded grant applications isn't talent—it's strategy. After analyzing hundreds of successful applications, here are the insider techniques that separate winners from wishful thinkers.
The FOMO-Driven Opening Formula
Your opening paragraph must trigger immediate fear of missing out. Start with a controversial statement that challenges conventional wisdom, followed by a shocking statistic that proves the urgency of your solution. For example: "While 85% of healthcare decisions are made by women, less than 4% of digital health funding goes to female-founded companies—creating a $50 billion market opportunity that's hiding in plain sight."
The Authority Establishment Framework
Establish credibility within the first 200 words using the "Triple Crown" approach: relevant experience, quantifiable achievements, and insider knowledge. Don't say "I have experience in marketing"—say "After generating $2.3M in revenue for B2B SaaS companies using my proprietary customer acquisition framework, I discovered the three psychological triggers that convert 34% better than industry standards."
The Evidence-Based Impact Promise
Replace vague outcomes with specific, measurable impacts tied to funder priorities. Instead of "improving women's economic empowerment," write "increasing average household income by 43% for 500 women in underserved communities through our skills-to-income certification program, validated through our pilot program with 87% completion rates."
The Strategic Social Proof Integration
Incorporate social proof that demonstrates momentum without revealing competitive disadvantages. Examples include "joining 12,000+ women entrepreneurs who've accessed our resource platform" or "validated by Fortune 500 executives from three different industries."
Grant Application Comparison Table
The 5 Fatal Mistakes That Kill 90% of Grant Applications
Mistake #1: Generic, Copy-Paste Applications
Over 75% of grant applications are rejected, with many failures resulting from submitting generic proposals to multiple funders rather than customizing each application. Grant committees can instantly identify mass-mailed applications. Each grant application must be specifically tailored to the funding organization and their stated priorities.
The solution: Research each funder's recent awards, funding history, and strategic objectives. Include specific language from their guidelines and demonstrate knowledge of their organizational mission.
Mistake #2: Weak Alignment with Funding Priorities
Too many applicants treat funding calls like open suggestions instead of precise mandates. If your project doesn't speak directly to what the call is asking for, it won't make it past the first review round.
Read the full call topic description, underline key phrases in the "expected outcomes" and "scope" sections, then mirror that language in your proposal introduction and objectives.
Mistake #3: Overcomplicated Writing and Dense Structure
Reviewers often have limited time and dozens of proposals to assess. Dense, jargon-heavy, or poorly formatted proposals become burdens that many reviewers stop engaging with.
Use descriptive headers and subheaders for every section, avoid long blocks of text, utilize bullet points and tables to organize ideas, and write in plain language that can be skimmed without losing meaning.
Mistake #4: Insufficient Evidence and Weak Data
The final area where grant applications frequently fail is evidence—or lack thereof. Claims without supporting data appear unsubstantiated and reduce credibility.
Back up every major claim with specific data, include relevant case studies or pilot program results, cite reputable sources for market research and industry statistics, and provide concrete metrics for projected outcomes.
Mistake #5: Last-Minute Submission and Poor Quality Control
The biggest grant application mistake is leaving applications to the last minute, resulting in rushed submissions with missing or poorly written information. Inaccurate or poorly written applications often get rejected regardless of project merit.
Create a grant calendar with deadlines and allocated time for each phase, set internal deadlines for each component before actual submission dates, and have trusted colleagues review applications for errors and improvement opportunities.
Standard Operating Procedures for Grant Success
Pre-Application Phase (4-6 Weeks Before Deadline)
- Funder Research Deep Dive: Analyze the funder's recent awards, organizational priorities, and application guidelines. Create a compatibility score based on alignment with your project goals.
- Eligibility Verification: Confirm every requirement is met before investing time in application development. Document evidence for each criterion.
- Documentation Assembly: Gather all required materials including financial statements, organizational charts, letters of support, and project timelines.
- Stakeholder Alignment: Secure commitments from key team members, advisors, and partner organizations mentioned in the proposal.
Application Development Phase (3-4 Weeks Before Deadline)
- Narrative Architecture: Develop the core story arc that connects your problem statement, solution, and impact in a compelling narrative flow.
- Budget Justification: Create detailed, realistic budgets with clear justifications for every line item. Align budget categories with funder priorities.
- Evidence Compilation: Gather supporting data, case studies, testimonials, and market research that validates your approach and demonstrates credibility.
- Impact Measurement Framework: Design specific, measurable outcomes with clear timelines and assessment methodologies.
Review and Refinement Phase (1-2 Weeks Before Deadline)
- Internal Review Process: Have team members with different expertise areas review sections for clarity, accuracy, and persuasiveness.
- External Validation: Seek feedback from previous grant winners, industry experts, or professional grant writers if budget allows.
- Compliance Check: Verify all formatting requirements, page limits, attachment specifications, and submission procedures are followed exactly.
- Final Quality Assurance: Proofread multiple times for spelling, grammar, factual errors, and consistency across all documents.
10 Opportunity Goldmines to Grab Right Now
October 2025 Opportunities
Capital Elle Business Impact Award - $50,000 in cash and services for 10 Canadian women entrepreneurs. Backed by 29 partners and designed to "flip the script on who gets funded in Canada". Deadline October 28, 2025.
November 2025 and Beyond
Aurora Tech Award 2026 - $85,000 total prize fund with $50,000 first place. Applications close November 12, 2025. Winners receive direct access to investors, inDrive's global network, and strategic visibility.
UpGreyed Her 2025 - $9,500 total grants for four winners ($4,000, $2,000, $2,000, $1,500). Female entrepreneurs aged 21-35 with tech-enabled businesses. Applications open March 8, close April 8, 2025.
Ongoing and Monthly Opportunities
Amber Grant Foundation - $10,000 monthly grants and $25,000 annual grants with rotating special categories. Simple application process makes this accessible for early-stage entrepreneurs.
Freed Fellowship Micro-Grant - $500 monthly to US business owners with no strings attached. Perfect for early-stage businesses needing unrestricted capital.
IFundWomen Universal Grant Program - $2,500-$25,000+ for startups and small businesses founded by women from underserved communities. Matches applicants with partner-funded grant opportunities year-round.
YippityDoo Small Business Grant - $1,000 monthly grants for US-based women with majority ownership, including mentorship and business directory features.
Insider Tips from Grant Winners and Reviewers
From Successful Aurora Tech Award Winners
"Very few women-centric programs provide actual funding. As a woman founder, it was heartening to see that the Aurora Tech Award backed its belief in women entrepreneurs with the catalyst of capital," said Shreya Prakash, third-place winner of Aurora Tech Award 2025 and CEO of FlexiBees India.
"What inspired me was knowing there's an award that recognizes not just technology, but the courage to innovate from our own lived realities. Applying to Aurora was my way of saying: women are also shaping the future through science," shared Loretxu Garcia, 2025 finalist from Chile.
Grant Reviewer Insights
According to professional grant reviewers, successful applications share three characteristics: immediate relevance to funder priorities, evidence-based impact projections, and clear demonstration of team capability to execute the proposed work.
Research from grant writing experts shows that funders appreciate stories that resonate on a personal level, backed up by statistics that show program impact. The combination of emotional storytelling with quantitative data increases success rates significantly.
Industry Expert Strategies
"Sell the dream. VCs make returns from maximizing upside, not from minimizing downside. Make sure you dream a little and paint a picture of how big the company could be one day," advises Jess Lee, investor at Sequoia Capital and former cofounder & CEO of Polyvore.
Professional grant writers emphasize focusing on outcomes and impact rather than processes: "Focus on the why not the how. Funders want to support solutions to problems—not the workplan to get there".
Things to Avoid When Applying for Grants
Red Flag Behaviors That Guarantee Rejection
Overusing AI in Applications: Grant reviewers can easily identify AI-generated content that strips out key evidence and adds unnecessary conclusions. Each word in an application needs to work hard, so AI-generated conclusions waste precious word count.
Misaligning with Geographical Restrictions: Many applications fail because founders ignore geographic eligibility requirements or attempt to apply for programs outside their qualifying regions.
Weak Budget Justifications: Failing to provide detailed, realistic budgets with clear justifications for every line item signals poor financial management.
Generic Letters of Support: Form letters that could apply to any applicant reduce credibility. Secure specific, detailed endorsements that reference your unique value proposition.
Communication Mistakes to Avoid
Underselling Your Achievements: Many women express discomfort at bragging, but it's important for investors to know who they're investing in and why they're special. This is the moment to highlight achievements that make you uniquely qualified.
Presenting Only Conservative Projections: Women are more likely to present base case scenarios while men use aggressive assumptions. Include both base case and upside scenarios.
Inadequate Problem Validation: Failing to demonstrate deep understanding of the problem you're solving or providing insufficient evidence that your target market actually needs your solution.
The Psychology of FOMO in Grant Applications
Understanding Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) psychology can revolutionize your grant applications. FOMO is defined as "a pervasive apprehension that others might be having rewarding experiences from which one is absent", and approximately 66% of people admit to experiencing FOMO at some point.
Triggering Funder FOMO
Create urgency by highlighting limited-time market opportunities, first-mover advantages in emerging sectors, or exclusive partnerships that competitors cannot replicate. Frame your request as a chance for funders to be part of something revolutionary rather than just another funding decision.
Social Proof Integration
Social proof leverages human tendency to follow crowd behavior and reduces decision-making friction by implying others have already validated the content's value. Include evidence of growing user bases, industry recognition, or strategic partnerships that demonstrate momentum.
Authority Triggers in Applications
Humans defer to perceived authority figures, making credibility establishment crucial within the first few sentences. Use results-based authority ("After generating $2M in revenue for 500+ clients"), insider knowledge ("Working with Fortune 500 CEOs taught me"), or contrarian expertise ("Everyone's wrong about customer acquisition").
FAQ on funding for female entrepreneurs
What makes Aurora Tech Award different from other female founder grants?
Aurora Tech Award stands out because it combines substantial funding ($85,000 total prize pool) with strategic access to inDrive's global network and investor connections. Unlike many grants that offer money alone, Aurora provides winners with mentorship from industry experts, media representation for visibility, and direct introductions to venture capital firms. The program specifically targets emerging markets where female founders face the greatest funding disparities, making it uniquely positioned to create systemic change in underserved regions.
How can female founders improve their grant application success rates beyond the typical 20%?
Success rates can increase to 45% or higher through strategic funder research, customized applications, and evidence-based proposals. The key differentiators include aligning project objectives precisely with funder priorities, providing specific quantifiable impacts rather than vague outcomes, establishing credibility through concrete achievements, and demonstrating clear understanding of the problem being solved. Successful applicants also invest significant time in pre-application preparation, gathering compelling evidence, and securing high-quality letters of support from industry leaders.
What psychological triggers make grant applications more compelling to reviewers?
The most effective psychological triggers include creating curiosity gaps that compel reviewers to continue reading, establishing authority through specific achievements and expertise, using social proof to demonstrate market validation and momentum, and triggering FOMO by highlighting time-sensitive opportunities or competitive advantages. Applications that combine emotional storytelling with hard data create stronger connections with reviewers while building credibility. The key is balancing these triggers naturally within the narrative rather than manipulating readers.
Which industries receive the most female founder grant funding in 2025?
Technology and healthcare dominate female founder grant opportunities, with deep tech, artificial intelligence, and digital health receiving the most targeted funding programs. Social impact ventures, particularly those addressing gender equality, economic empowerment, and community development, also attract significant grant attention. Emerging sectors like climate technology, fintech, and educational technology show growing investment from both government and corporate grant programs specifically designed for women entrepreneurs.
How should female founders approach grant budgeting differently than traditional fundraising?
Grant budgeting requires more detailed justifications and conservative projections compared to venture capital fundraising. Successful grant budgets align every expense category with specific project outcomes, demonstrate clear understanding of allowable costs per funder guidelines, and include contingency planning for unexpected challenges. Unlike VC pitches that emphasize growth potential, grant budgets must prove fiscal responsibility and measurable impact per dollar invested while staying within funder-specified spending categories.
What are the most common reasons female founder grant applications get rejected?
The primary rejection reasons include misalignment with funder priorities (applications that don't address specific call requirements), insufficient evidence to support claims (lack of market research, pilot data, or credible projections), poor application quality (rushed submissions with errors, formatting issues, or unclear explanations), unrealistic project scopes (overly ambitious timelines or unachievable outcomes), and weak team credentials (inability to demonstrate relevant experience or capability to execute proposed work).
How can early-stage female founders compete with more established businesses for grants?
Early-stage founders can leverage their agility, innovation potential, and personal founder stories to differentiate from established competitors. Focus on demonstrating deep market understanding, strong customer validation through pilot programs or surveys, strategic partnerships that provide credibility, clear growth trajectories with specific milestones, and unique value propositions that larger companies cannot replicate. Many grant programs specifically prioritize early-stage ventures for their potential to create disruptive change.
What networking strategies work best for discovering hidden grant opportunities?
The most effective networking approaches include joining women entrepreneur organizations that share exclusive funding opportunities, attending industry conferences where corporate sponsors announce new grant programs, building relationships with successful grant recipients who can provide insider insights, connecting with grant consultants and professional writers who track emerging opportunities, and following venture capital firms that sponsor women-focused initiatives. Active engagement in online communities and social media groups also reveals time-sensitive opportunities before widespread awareness.
How important is geographic location for female founder grant eligibility?
Geographic restrictions vary significantly by program, with many grants limited to specific countries, regions, or economic development zones. US-based programs dominate overall funding volume, while European initiatives like Women TechEU and the European Prize for Women Innovators serve EU markets. Emerging market programs like Aurora Tech Award specifically target underserved regions where female founders face greater funding barriers. Some global programs accept applicants worldwide but may prioritize certain geographic regions based on strategic objectives.
What role does social impact play in female founder grant selection criteria?
Social impact has become increasingly important in grant selection, with many programs prioritizing ventures that address societal challenges, advance gender equality, or create positive community outcomes. Successful applicants articulate clear connections between their business objectives and broader social benefits, provide measurable social impact metrics alongside financial projections, and demonstrate understanding of how their success contributes to systemic change. However, impact must be authentic and integrated into the business model rather than superficial add-on messaging.
The brutal truth about female founder funding isn't just a statistic—it's a $1.7 trillion opportunity that's hiding in plain sight while 97.7% of venture capital flows to male-dominated teams. But here's what the data doesn't show: the women who refuse to accept these odds and strategically leverage grant funding are building the next generation of unicorn companies.
The Aurora Tech Award's November 12, 2025 deadline isn't just another date on your calendar—it's your chance to join the 2.3% who are rewriting the rules of entrepreneurship. While others wait for venture capital crumbs, smart female founders are securing equity-free funding that lets them maintain control while scaling their visions.
Don't let another funding cycle pass while billions in grant money sits unclaimed. The statistics are shocking, the opportunities are real, and the deadline is approaching. Your idea deserves a seat at the table, and these grants are your invitation to claim it.
About the Author
Violetta Bonenkamp, also known as MeanCEO, is an experienced startup founder with an impressive educational background including an MBA and four other higher education degrees. She has over 20 years of work experience across multiple countries, including 5 years as a solopreneur and serial entrepreneur. Throughout her startup experience she has applied for multiple startup grants at the EU level, in the Netherlands and Malta, and her startups received quite a few of those. She’s been living, studying and working in many countries around the globe and her extensive multicultural experience has influenced her immensely.
Violetta Bonenkamp's expertise in CAD sector, IP protection and blockchain
Violetta Bonenkamp is recognized as a multidisciplinary expert with significant achievements in the CAD sector, intellectual property (IP) protection, and blockchain technology.
CAD Sector:
- Violetta is the CEO and co-founder of CADChain, a deep tech startup focused on developing IP management software specifically for CAD (Computer-Aided Design) data. CADChain addresses the lack of industry standards for CAD data protection and sharing, using innovative technology to secure and manage design data.
- She has led the company since its inception in 2018, overseeing R&D, PR, and business development, and driving the creation of products for platforms such as Autodesk Inventor, Blender, and SolidWorks.
- Her leadership has been instrumental in scaling CADChain from a small team to a significant player in the deeptech space, with a diverse, international team.
IP Protection:
- Violetta has built deep expertise in intellectual property, combining academic training with practical startup experience. She has taken specialized courses in IP from institutions like WIPO and the EU IPO.
- She is known for sharing actionable strategies for startup IP protection, leveraging both legal and technological approaches, and has published guides and content on this topic for the entrepreneurial community.
- Her work at CADChain directly addresses the need for robust IP protection in the engineering and design industries, integrating cybersecurity and compliance measures to safeguard digital assets.
Blockchain:
- Violetta’s entry into the blockchain sector began with the founding of CADChain, which uses blockchain as a core technology for securing and managing CAD data.
- She holds several certifications in blockchain and has participated in major hackathons and policy forums, such as the OECD Global Blockchain Policy Forum.
- Her expertise extends to applying blockchain for IP management, ensuring data integrity, traceability, and secure sharing in the CAD industry.
Violetta is a true multiple specialist who has built expertise in Linguistics, Education, Business Management, Blockchain, Entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property, Game Design, AI, SEO, Digital Marketing, cyber security and zero code automations. Her extensive educational journey includes a Master of Arts in Linguistics and Education, an Advanced Master in Linguistics from Belgium (2006-2007), an MBA from Blekinge Institute of Technology in Sweden (2006-2008), and an Erasmus Mundus joint program European Master of Higher Education from universities in Norway, Finland, and Portugal (2009).
She is the founder of Fe/male Switch, a startup game that encourages women to enter STEM fields, and also leads CADChain, and multiple other projects like the Directory of 1,000 Startup Cities with a proprietary MeanCEO Index that ranks cities for female entrepreneurs. Violetta created the "gamepreneurship" methodology, which forms the scientific basis of her startup game. She also builds a lot of SEO tools for startups. Her achievements include being named one of the top 100 women in Europe by EU Startups in 2022 and being nominated for Impact Person of the year at the Dutch Blockchain Week. She is an author with Sifted and a speaker at different Universities. Recently she published a book on Startup Idea Validation the right way: from zero to first customers and beyond, launched a Directory of 1,500+ websites for startups to list themselves in order to gain traction and build backlinks and is building MELA AI to help local restaurants in Malta get more visibility online.
For the past several years Violetta has been living between the Netherlands and Malta, while also regularly traveling to different destinations around the globe, usually due to her entrepreneurial activities. This has led her to start writing about different locations and amenities from the POV of an entrepreneur. Here’s her recent article about the best hotels in Italy to work from.
About the Publication
Fe/male Switch is an innovative startup platform designed to empower women entrepreneurs through an immersive, game-like experience. Founded in 2020 during the pandemic "without any funding and without any code," this non-profit initiative has evolved into a comprehensive educational tool for aspiring female entrepreneurs.The platform was co-founded by Violetta Shishkina-Bonenkamp, who serves as CEO and one of the lead authors of the Startup News branch.
Mission and Purpose
Fe/male Switch Foundation was created to address the gender gap in the tech and entrepreneurship space. The platform aims to skill-up future female tech leaders and empower them to create resilient and innovative tech startups through what they call "gamepreneurship". By putting players in a virtual startup village where they must survive and thrive, the startup game allows women to test their entrepreneurial abilities without financial risk.
Key Features
The platform offers a unique blend of news, resources,learning, networking, and practical application within a supportive, female-focused environment:
- Skill Lab: Micro-modules covering essential startup skills
- Virtual Startup Building: Create or join startups and tackle real-world challenges
- AI Co-founder (PlayPal): Guides users through the startup process
- SANDBOX: A testing environment for idea validation before launch
- Wellness Integration: Virtual activities to balance work and self-care
- Marketplace: Buy or sell expert sessions and tutorials
Impact and Growth
Since its inception, Fe/male Switch has shown impressive growth:
- 5,000+ female entrepreneurs in the community
- 100+ startup tools built
- 5,000+ pieces of articles and news written
- 1,000 unique business ideas for women created
Partnerships
Fe/male Switch has formed strategic partnerships to enhance its offerings. In January 2022, it teamed up with global website builder Tilda to provide free access to website building tools and mentorship services for Fe/male Switch participants.
Recognition
Fe/male Switch has received media attention for its innovative approach to closing the gender gap in tech entrepreneurship. The platform has been featured in various publications highlighting its unique "play to learn and earn" model.
