Copy the survey, send it to active users, then type in the answer counts. You get your PMF score, a band, a sample-size check, a behaviour check and three next steps.
Step 1
Who to ask:
Step 2
Example numbers loaded (40 responses). Replace them with your own.
Step 3 (optional)
Not sure what your score means for your idea? Paste the result and your follow-up answers into a chat with Elona, your AI co-founder, or test demand quest by quest in the Fe/male Switch startup game.
Ask Elona about my score Play the startup gameSources and date: Sean Ellis (Venture Hacks interview, 2009), Rahul Vohra (First Round Review, 2018), Kromatic's Real Startup Book; checked 7 November 2026. The 40% line is Ellis's; the 25% line is our reading, and the margin of error is our calculation (95%). Nothing you type leaves your browser.
| Business type | Good 6-month retention | Great 6-month retention | Counted from |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer social | about 25% | about 45% | registered users |
| Consumer transactional (marketplaces, booking) | about 30% | about 50% | users with at least one transaction |
| Consumer subscription (SaaS) | about 40% | about 70% | users who started a paid subscription |
| SMB and mid-market SaaS | about 60% | about 80% | companies with a paid subscription |
| Enterprise SaaS | about 70% | about 90% | companies with a paid subscription |
Source: Lenny Rachitsky, "What is good retention?", Lenny's Newsletter, 9 June 2020, based on answers from about 20 growth experts. The article gives both 70% and 75% as good enterprise retention; the table uses 70%.
| Measure | What it tells you | When it lies | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sean Ellis test (40% survey) | How many active users would be very disappointed to lose the product, and who they are | Small samples, or surveys sent to fans and non-users | Low: one form, 30 to 40 answers |
| Retention cohort | Whether people keep using the product after week 1, month 1 and month 3 | Tiny cohorts, or a loose definition of active | Medium: needs a few months of usage data |
| Net Promoter Score (NPS) | How likely people are to recommend you on a 0 to 10 scale: % promoters (9 to 10) minus % detractors (0 to 6) | It measures goodwill, and polite users give a 9 to a product they will never open again | Low: one question |
| Paying customers and revenue | Whether people value the product enough to pay, and keep paying | One large customer, deep discounts or a launch-week spike can hide churn | Low once you charge |
| Organic share of new users | What share of new users came through word of mouth, referrals or a search for your name | Hard to read unless you ask every new user how they found you | Low: one "how did you hear about us?" question at signup |
Our comparison, 7 November 2026. NPS definition from Bain & Company's Net Promoter System site.
| Signal | Why it feels like fit | What to check instead |
|---|---|---|
| Friends and family love it | They are honest about liking you | Ask strangers in your target group for money or a pre-order |
| Hundreds of signups or a long waitlist | A big number on launch day | How many signups used it twice in two weeks, and how many paid |
| Press coverage or a viral post | Reporters and strangers are talking about you | Retention of the users who arrived that week, 4 and 8 weeks later |
| Nice survey answers from everyone | High average scores | The very disappointed share among active users only |
| One big customer | Real revenue and a real logo | Whether a second and third similar customer buy without custom work |
| Growth from paid ads | Charts go up and to the right | What happens to signups and retention when you pause ads for two weeks |
Our list, based on the methods on this page.
| Answer | Responses | Share of the base |
|---|---|---|
| Very disappointed | 16 | 34.8% |
| Somewhat disappointed | 21 | 45.7% |
| Not disappointed | 9 | 19.6% |
| N/A, I no longer use it | 6 | left out of the base |
| Base (52 answers minus 6 N/A) | 46 | 100% |
Invented numbers for illustration.